Comments (2)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
Assassin47 3 points ago +3 / -0

War is acceptable to stop someone else from violating the NAP. A court can decide later if it was a crime or not.

But when I say war I mean limited action against the threat actors, not attacking a whole population.

1
MLJFireDragon747 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sanctions don’t do shit, and civilians are always the losers in the face of military actions. Bad international actors do need counterbalance however, the nature of government is the disorder, the main one at least.