"Officer he's refusing the vaccine. He's endangering me by not taking the vaccine. The state should not allow him to endanger me by not taking the vaccine. Save me, save me. Kill him, kill him."
Who defines what's good and bad if there are no victims but one's self? Keep shilling.
I agree that was obviously about drug laws, but could also apply to the attempts to criminalize sodas, ban vaping, porn bans, prostitution bans, the ban on three wheelers, etc.
I'm not too sure about the third one. Also while this is a little based, it sounds too SJW so I think libertarians should try a different approach.
"Officer he's refusing the vaccine. He's endangering me by not taking the vaccine. The state should not allow him to endanger me by not taking the vaccine. Save me, save me. Kill him, kill him."
Who defines what's good and bad if there are no victims but one's self? Keep shilling.
In this case the victim is everyone else by refusing the vaccine. Also when was I shilling? I was thinking of drug laws. Dumbass
I agree that was obviously about drug laws, but could also apply to the attempts to criminalize sodas, ban vaping, porn bans, prostitution bans, the ban on three wheelers, etc.