If one kills a pregnant woman, they are charged with double homicide.
How can that be when the fetus/mass of cells is not considered a developing being by abortion advocates?
If one kills a pregnant woman, they are charged with double homicide.
How can that be when the fetus/mass of cells is not considered a developing being by abortion advocates?
For claiming to not want to get in the minutiae, he really goes deep into it.
Using the "logic" outlined by Rothbard, murder is legal when one considers another person/being as a parasite.
Also, that does not answer the legal matter of "why charge homicide for a murdered pregnant woman, wherein the fetus/'parasite'(using Rothbard's term) also dies".
I see where you are going.
There are more lines of thought to extend from this, but this platform is not the best to convey without being misunderstood.