Win / Ancaps
Ancaps
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Ancaps Anarcho-Capitalism: The Political Philosophy of Non-Aggression
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
Curious about what ancaps think of monopolies and oligopolies?
posted 4 years ago by gunteh 4 years ago by gunteh +6 / -0

New to ancap ideology, curious to know more.

18 comments share
18 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– gunteh [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Thats a good point, most companies can offer the illusion of choice by diversifying their product lines along different price points or feature optimization.

Ive worked for a few global companies, and the level of control across regions is scary. Many global companies (like Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft) can afford to have offices in every major country, and many times multiple office locations in those same countries. Due to their flat corporate structure in tech companies, they are highly agile to shifting market conditions all across the world, and its scary to think if a company had a complete stranglehold on the global economy they could really shut down local competition.

More recently, its been government intervention thats been trying to hold back the growing influence of these tech companies (GDPR and the lawsuit against Google in the EU come to mind right away), but Im wondering if government is the only way to respond to a growing oligopoly or monopoly, or if theres an free market "event horizon" where a certain level of competition must exist in order to prevent a monopoly from forming.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– fingis_dartan 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Speaking of illusion of choice; I previously worked for AT&T and was privy to the fact that they actively work with other internet service providers to negotiate non-compete regions so they can all charge exorbitant prices for sub par services. This primarily happens in suburb and exurb communities. Why I don't believe that regulation is a net positive, to say that there are not specific situations where it has it's merits is equally mistaken. Still though, if having to chose between over-regulation and ancap, i'd take ancap any day. I'm tired of being told what I can and cannot do with the product of my own labor. I am not a slave.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– gunteh [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I feel ya, my neighborhood only has comcast and I hate not having any choice or competition. But would you say that AT&T got those non-competes from government regulation or from bargaining with other private companies? I really dont know much about the ISP and cell coverage market.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome to AnCaps.win!

Welcome to the Anarcho-Capitalism community for the .WIN network, and the official reddit-alternative for the r/Anarcho_Capitalism subreddit.

You can also reach this page by going to Communities.win/c/Ancaps

Rules

Follow The Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States.

No Promotion of Violence

Do not encourage or call for violence against ideological opponents or anyone else.

No Personal and Confidential Information.

No doxxing or sharing of other similarly sensitive information.

No Spam

Occasionally plugging something is permitted, but spam and "spammy" behavior (e.g., flooding the board with low quality posts) is not.

No Racism

Talking about sensitive topics in this area is allowed, but doing it in a way that dehumanizes groups of people or conveys/inspires hatred is not.

Other misc. disallowed stuff

No pornography, sexualization of minors, or deceptive impersonations

Moderators

  • Z3F-
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - wpl9c (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy