posted ago by FutileAnonymity ago by FutileAnonymity +3 / -1

This thought has been occupying my mind for months. Democracies and republics are handing over the right of the individual to the will of the collective. Dictatorships are similar, but I would rather have one man dedicated to preserve my rights lead than have the collective lead, but it seems only possible in concept. You can have a branch of government attached to monarch or senate that has a constitution that supposedly helps secure the rights of the individual, but that’s about it.

BUT IT BAFFLES ME THAT THIS IS THE BEST WE CAN COME UP WITH!

Is this a futile puzzle to solve. Literally, it feels like I’m trying to solve a brain teaser.

Is archo capitalism possible? Where the rights of the individual are not up for a vote and the a nation has no state?

It sound almost like the dark ages, no law or order, but I would love for a capitalistic nation exist.

Fuck taxes.