posted ago by Josemarti ago by Josemarti +6 / -0

We should all be a nation of one individual. No need to have states to try to hold us together.

Comments (6)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Tenet 2 points ago +2 / -0

That may be your desire, but I have the right to disagree and band together with other property owners to establish a Covenant Community, and secure a private border against ideologies and activities that detract from Human flourishing, and that oppose the protection of my rights.

I wish to disassociate with the delusional ideology of extreme Individualism.

I wish to affirm the Human nature of a guardian of children, community builder, group-survivor and promoter of supportive culture.

The rejection of the State is not the same as the rejection of a National identity.

The rejection of the State is not the same as the rejection of voluntary forms of Government.

Anarchism is the rejection of the Archon, the aggressive overlord. Anarchism is not Lawlessness or the prohibition on Voluntary Organization and Natural Hierarchy.

Consider this summary reference:

Josemarti [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read the article. I thought it would expound more on the ideas you mentioned above.

What's the line between a covenant community and government? What's the line between covenant community and extreme individualism?

I never advocated for lawlessness. The nonaggression principle is key.

ideology_is_fear 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is extreme individualism?

Josemarti [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the term he used first to describe mine. He never defined it. I'm trying to get a chat going but he hasn't replied. Though he's an ancap he believes in some sort of collective that's still a bit more than the socalled extreme individualism i purpose.