Isn't that a constant fear now, that big government would somehow legislate basic rights away. Something by definition they can not do, for basic rights can only be claimed by a human being and any laws that take them away are fraudulent and should be ignored by the people. So I would assume in an ancap society the walls are built by the people for the people according to the needs of the people as they decide to allocate resources towards a 'wall'. (Assuming disputes over contracts and common law violations are handled through 'dispute resolution agents', like insurance agents but for contract violations and provided through private means or by philanthropy.) Everyone would decide for themselves what kind of 'wall' they require to live. House walls, property fences, security cameras, private security guards, dogs, personal armaments, excetra. They could also decide to build a community where everyone is veted before they are allowed in and strict rules must by followed inside, like everyone needs to help man the wall 4 hours per week and cut off their penis's. Must of us already live lives based on the tenants of anarchy, besides what would an invading country seize if there is no public property, no tax base, no way to assess accurately the means of defense and therefore the cost of invasion. Then even if a hostile government does takeover and seizes all the gold, cars and computers, all they do is destroy the value of gold, used cars and computers back home. This kind of invasion is only possible if another people are being exploited by their government to foot the bill. Something that could not happen if all the world had no exploitation by government. Anyone at that point who would suggest something as evil as a government would be ridiculed and shunned from society. Remember actions have consequences even in an ancap society.

Isn't that a constant fear now, that big government would somehow legislate basic rights away. Something by definition they can not do, for basic rights can only be claimed by a human being and any laws that take them away are fraudulent and should be ignored by the people. So I would assume in an ancap society the walls are built by the people for the people according to the needs of the people as they decide to allocate resources towards a 'wall'. (Assuming disputes over contracts and common law violations are handled through 'dispute resolution agents', like insurance agents but for contract violations and provided through private means or by philanthropy.) Everyone would decide for themselves what kind of 'wall' they require to live. House walls, property fences, security cameras, private security guards, dogs, personal armaments, excetra. They could also decide to build a community where everyone is veted before they are allowed in and strict rules must by followed inside, like everyone needs to help man the wall 4 hours per week and cut off their penis's. Must of us already live lives based on the tenants of anarchy, besides what would an invading country seize if there is no public property, no tax base, no way to assess accurately the means of defense and therefore the cost of invasion. Then even if a hostile government does takeover and seizes all the gold, cars and computers, all they do is destroy the value of gold, used cars and computers back home. This kind of invasion is only possible if another people are being exploited by their government to foot the bill. Something that could not happen if all the world had no exploitation by government. Anyone at that point who would suggest something as evil as a government would be shunned and ridiculed from society. Remember actions have consequences even in an ancap society.

Isn't that a constant fear now, that big government would somehow legislate basic rights away. Something by definition they can not do, for basic rights can only be claimed by a human being and any laws that take them away are fraudulent and should be ignored by the people. So I would assume in an ancap society the walls are built by the people for the people according to the needs of the people as they decide to allocate resources towards a 'wall'. (Assuming disputes over contracts and common law violations are handled through 'dispute resolution agents', like insurance agents but for contract violations and provided through private means or by philanthropy.) Everyone would decide for themselves what kind of 'wall' they require to live. House walls, property fences, security cameras, private security guards, dogs, personal armaments, excetra. They could also decide to build a community where everyone is veted before they are allowed in and strict rules must by followed inside, like everyone needs to help man the wall 4 hours per week and cut off their penis's. Must of us already live lives based on the tenants of anarchy, besides what would an invading country seize if there is no public property, no tax base, no way to assess accurately the means of defense and therefore the cost of invasion. Then even if a hostile government does takeover and seizes all the gold, cars and computers, all they do is destroy the value of gold, used cars and computers back home. This kind of invasion is only possible if another people are being exploited by their government to foot the bill. Something that could not happen if all the world had no exploitation by government. Anyone at that point who would suggest something as evil as a government would be shunned and ridiculed from society. Remember actions have consequences.

Isn't that a constant fear now, that big government would somehow legislate basic rights away. Something by definition they can not do, for basic rights can only be claimed by a human being and any laws that take them away are fraudulent and should be ignored by the people. So I would assume in an ancap society the walls are built by the people for the people according to the needs of the people as they decide to allocate resources towards a 'wall'. (Assuming disputes over contracts and common law violations are handled through 'dispute resolution agents', like insurance agents but for contract violations and provided through private means or by philanthropy.) Everyone would decide for themselves what kind of 'wall' they require to live. House walls, property fences, security cameras, private security guards, dogs, personal armaments, excetra. They could also decide to build a community where everyone is veted before they are allowed in and strict rules must by followed inside, like everyone needs to help man the wall 4 hours per week and cut off their penis's. Must of us already live lives based on the tenants of anarchy, besides what would an invading country seize if there is no public property, no tax base, no way to assess accurately the means of defense and therefore the cost of invasion. Then even if a hostile government does takeover and seizes all the gold, cars and computers, all they do is destroy the value of gold, used cars and computers. This kind of invasion is only possible if another people are being exploited by their government to foot the bill. Something that could not happen if all the world had no exploitation by government. Anyone at that point who would suggest something as evil as a government would be shunned and ridiculed from society. Remember actions have consequences.