Well I'm bringing up how unadjectived anarchism has been corrupted worse by ancoms than ancaps, to the point that it was founded with a purpose to overthrow capitalism until it was wrested back in the 1880s. I'm trying to defend these folks a bit rather than call them an empire of lies along with you.
At the time I was duckduckgoing "Anarchist flag".... and you can see for yourself.
But according to wikipedia
Anarchism without adjectives – in the words of historian George Esenwein, "referred to an unhyphenated form of anarchism, that is, a doctrine without any qualifying labels such as communist, collectivist, mutualist, or individualist. For others, ... [it] was simply understood as an attitude that tolerated the coexistence of different anarchist schools."[51] It served as basis for the synthesis anarchism federation.
This supposed "living constitutionalism" reading is immediately filled with ancoms for the most part. That means the ancoms refer to their flag as "anarchy's destination"
This mentality can no more be summed up than in calling something "The red flag of anarchy" which I had this open in a tab at the time
Would an ancap dare make a page called "The yellow flag of anarchy"?
Anarchism is really drenched with them, not misguided. Wave the 1880s black flag instead of that shitty red and black flag.
So you were calling yourself part of the empire of lies in a hope that I would feel bad for you and show myself out with my unadjectived anarchism.
Very pointy brained.