I am not an economist. But I've hard about government being able to go into as much debt as it wants and not have to pay it back - unlike us.
I'll take a look at the Friedman. I understand that in a state of nature, you are living on a plain of anarchy with a structure of government on top of it. Since because having a government (not necessarily like the ones we interact with today) is natural and anarchy is natural, I take a careful approach to approaching either extreme. While I genuinely do believe that government sucks at everything, (e.g) government has a bad problem with military innovation because operations have to be kept secret so contractors cannot just operate as they wish, thinking up an an alternate system to national defense is quite annoying as generally I think the system should be chosen by the free market. I sort of have a pavlovian response of 'ugh' when the time comes to cover how a system should be implemented because it reminds me of socialists experimenting with their stuff but I'll take an interest in this side of things rather then just the moral argument now.
Do not question my virility, nonce. At least I can take a vaccine without having a pussy reaction.
Haha found the retard. Side effects are real and extremely rare and I don't care about what you think either.
Bible verses? Based.
I've seen worse on plebbit
The optimism is reassuring. As someone who is not yet paying taxes (2004 baby), I have half a mind to resist too. I would participate in the secession myself and while I am sure that you already know this, keep in mind that we have instances of governance in everything that we do. We are governed by hunger, curiosity and embarrassment (as we should be). I don't want to eliminate all law and order here. Especially as a social conservative. Ancapistan sounds nice!
I would goddamn hope so. If we are taking the extreme definition then I would presume even looking at someone in a way that made them uncomfortable would violate the NAP. It sounds good but it's also extreme the way how marxists believe that employment is slavery for access to food. :/
Anti-vaxxers are right to have the spirit which you express here but I believe that this is not a case when they are right (e.g. the vaccine gave me autism).
Will watch. Thanks!
I don't think all crimes can be punished by either execution or ostracism, even by this definition. It doesn't sound all too convincing.
It definitely lowers effective taxation. The rich pay for fucking everything. People are enriched when they create value and the government does all things shitty - including that.
Indeed. My hypothesis of degeneracy is that it lies on a spectrum, the same spectrum as pedophiles, transgenders and such. Society exists to keep degeneracy at bay.
This is literally antifa and damn near the entirety of the left.
I think I understand your feet and wallets idea. But many governments are not making the change. For (e.g.) a federal government to lose power, their must be a nationwide redpilling which I do not see coming. There is a growing sentiment of wanting to use the government which I do not see diminishing any time within the next couple hundred years (the demand is for more government, not less). So this idea of voluntary governance is not something I see coming unless we have another round of founding fathers to revolt.
Do you even know what fascism is? It failed. It sucks. Shut up mussolinifag
All of our actions over the internet are being recorded.
I realise that the reason we aren't speaking some dialect of Chinese is because of our militaries and that is why I proposed a minarchist government. Also I would bet that even if we started afresh, people would immediately begin to form groups (countries) and fight eachother.
With the way how the model is now, the US would cripple itself if it was to be implemented because there is no structure - and I don't think that cooperatives of people would be as effective.
why can't you fuck off to fascism.win or something, socialist
The answer to bad speech is more speech. You don't sound like much of a libertarian.
That sounds quite reasonable. But what about situations where the lines are a little blurry and both parties disagree? We would need a court to decide the outcome and punishment. There should definitely be a judicial branch of government for sure. I know it's a work in progress.
So you simply tell the person to go away? Prisons are starting to look like a better alternative now. Anyways, who would dictate what punishment is worthy for what aggression? What is the replacement for courts in minarchism?
Downloaded the second edition last night.