Comments (6)
sorted by:
3
Traveling_Thru_Time 3 points ago +3 / -0

Glorious!!!

2
bluewhiteandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

"anarcho-monarchy" was previously used as a term expressing indifference towards if there is anarchy or a monarchy, like J.R.R. Tolkien apparently was in to this viewpoint

This use of "anarcho-monarchy" sounds confusing - the people consent to follow someone like a king? That's consensual leadership - sure, he can be called a king, or leader, but it's maybe different from monarchy and redundant to call anarcho-monarchy.

2
based_biker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, this ain't it chief

2
ausglitsch 2 points ago +2 / -0

this

wtf OP

1
Comntrinchief 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are the downsides? One I foresee is protection from other countries waging war on you. Don’t seem like it could scale up enough to pull that off. Maybe it could though. Who knows?

1
based_biker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anarcho-Monarchy is an oxymoron