1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

"trade or war" applies to all economic, political, and religious systems throughout human history

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

you're insulting the NAP to put it like that, but ancaps largely don't believe in it anyway- so i'm not sure why i'm even saying this

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

very large guns, traps, private security, private police, private detectives, mercenaries, and private arbitration

2
ausglitsch 2 points ago +2 / -0

as long as the government isn't giving them welfare, however large, idgaf how big a corporation becomes

i will say, however, that- the larger you get, the more complex it becomes managing your enterprise; and you really have to weigh the potential costs of survival vs. transformation at all times

by scd3
1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

what the fuck is wrong with you

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

depends on if there's an opportunity cost somewhere else in the business. you're suggesting that there are solutions without trade-offs. why?

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

sir, you may or may know this, but people buy ice cream just about everywhere else they're able. if mcdonald's can't figure that out for—shit—19 years (when last i worked there), they're not going to. the market incentive isn't strong enough for them fo do so. i don't see the issue here at all

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

make your own licenses and let a neutral third party who's making better use of it until the licenses are done away with it altogether. think HAM radio in mexico—many people use it, and it's not an issue. it's already similar with trucker CB frequencies

3
ausglitsch 3 points ago +3 / -0

antisemitic

ancap

sir please have a couple of seats. we need to talk

0
ausglitsch 0 points ago +1 / -1

probably not. i'm not arguing for the overthrow of capitalism, my guy

kinda the opposite

kinda the overthrow of smooth brain nonsense you'd prefer

anything else, or are you done embarrassing yourself?

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

in what universe did i suggest that i'm (if this is even theoretically possible) an ancom?

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

fair warning: he's not an anarchist by any stretch of the imagination, but enjoy your upvote. i've got my eyes on you

5
ausglitsch 5 points ago +5 / -0

i think people should do whatever the fuck they want

3
ausglitsch 3 points ago +3 / -0

truth is treason in an empire of lies

anyway- nice username; have fun lol

2
ausglitsch 2 points ago +2 / -0

slavery is expressly illegal in every modern nation on earth today, and yet it happens in- i'd venture a guess- every single one of them

under a system where people are truly free to alienate their labor and its proceeds, it'd be even easier for good people to set others, who may be living in bondage, free

presently, that's up to.. the same people who have a monopoly on the legal initiation of the use of force. it would neither be legal nor illegal--literally what is anarchy

do you really suppose it'd be any better/worse under anarcho-communism or anarcho-primitivism?

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

the only way to coherently explain it is as if you're 5 fyi: we need to be nice to people, and borders are just made-up—we're all one human race, but evil republicans don't like anyone who isn't a white male

1
ausglitsch 1 point ago +1 / -0

the way some of you retards are arguing for it? absolutely; yes, but that's not what i'm arguing for at all

2
ausglitsch 2 points ago +2 / -0

if you do it individually because they keep actively disturbing you/people you care about, idgaf. if people start banding together to do it, i'll kill you all with a smile on my face

3
ausglitsch 3 points ago +3 / -0

leave them alone, encourage them to do the same, and make clear what the consequences will be if they don't