"customer is king" mentality is the competitive edge that certain businesses have used to make it big. There are numerous case studies of Nordstrom, Zappos, and others that show employee catering to customers are a primary driver of higher profit margins.
This would definitely still exist.
let's see if this community fares any better
at best, the community there is almost entirely libertarian, the entire thread is filled with moral high ground nonsense about things being "not allowed" as if there is some kind of formal enforcement in ancapville
My claim: obviously children are not autonomous, caring for children is a topic that the NAP simply cannot cover
From that perspective, you can't regulate the sale of children, which is the same as adoption for cash, without diving deep into someone else's personal business. I don't understand why anyone would want to.
If you want some entertainment, check out the thread and laugh at the "buyers/adoptive parents need background checks" insanity. Obviously a caring parent giving a child for adoption would do that. Obviously a drugged out parent selling kids for a fix wouldn't.
which is why the banks just stop supporting transactions to major crypto exchanges at will