11

It makes sense. If they are going to freeze your account anyway, without a warrant, of course you would take all the money you can out. That not only includes truckers, but everyone who donated. But the question is what happens if everyone who supports the truckers does it at the same time. Or even more broadly those who want to protest arbitrary freezing of assets of with no judicial oversight. Or those who are opposed to mandates. Or those who just want to fuck with Trudeau. Or people who want to protest a financial system that allows for this.

So that makes the next attack obvious. Run on the bank. Tell everyone that is the new thing. It's more likely to happen if people hear it more than once from more than one source. You heard it from me. Now it's time to pass it on.

If anything I'm late to the party in reminding you. They've already started to do it. Just a reminder that if you are Canadian, you probably want to pull your money out.

Also, they've slowly started to use the word seize instead of the word freeze.

Also, if you run a business in Canada start asking customers to pay in cash or charge a small fee for card use so those people also pull out their cash.

posted ago by x0x7 ago by x0x7
11

For example, a repo man can be one layer of rights enforcement. How do property owners use private resources to minimize escalation while asserting their rights when multiple people get involved.

For context, this is what can happen in some communities if you try to repossess something: https://gvid.tv/v/zJVKda

What repercushions exist for violating property rights as a group, or should exist, and what parties and actions account for that?

11
view more: ‹ Prev Next ›