Look, there are genuinely gay people. Honestly those people I don't have any issue with at all, they don't go around trying to change my life and I don't go around trying to change theirs.
The folks I have a problem with are these bred gay people, they start off normal but get into some clique of weirdos that try to outdo each other to their point their over there chopping off their dicks and trying to get me fired for not knowing some off the wall pronoun they made up last week. Those guys right there can fuck right off. Go on and chop off whatever you want, but don't go getting upset at me for viewing you are the circus freak that you've become.
Agreed. I know someone who just came out as trans and "he" is now claiming to be a woman. He has a beard. A long one. He isnt going to shave it, either. At some point people need to step back and say, "fuck, man. Im a bearded woman. What the fuck am i doing?" Do you know how hard it is to take someone claiming to be a bearded woman seriously?
Indeed.
My hypothesis of degeneracy is that it lies on a spectrum, the same spectrum as pedophiles, transgenders and such. Society exists to keep degeneracy at bay.
I think nature allows for creative ways to procreate. Lgbtq is that expression. For example 50% of men do not pass on their genetics. That's huge. These other sexual expressions are subsets that may arise from this problem. A man who dresses as a woman may have a better chance of gaining the confidence of another woman and being able to pass on their genetics. A pedophile may be driven to fuck their children instead of eat them during a famine thus continueing the race instead of dying out. Nature doesn't give a fuck about your feelings on degeneration, however I believe all humans have the right to their own bodies and the choice they make. Children do not have rights because they can not claim them, therefore they can not give consent.
Agreed. Obviously their are better ways to procreate and in a k society the male and female parents have a few children and invest energy into each one to ensure the best chance of success. In r populations the family unit breaks down and there is little investment into children. These societies collapse when they exhaust their resources, either through over population or missuse of resources or both. I think what we are seeing in America is the change from a k type dominant society to an r type dominant society. This is why there are more expressions of negative type sexualities now. It isn't about the future, its about bliss in the moment at the expense of the future.
"LGBT" (and even "gay") are marketing terms invented by left-wingers to legitimize various forms of mental illness. They are their top new activist class, who owe their place in society and their very self-esteem to government force, and they would do anything to defend the state.
That movement has no sustainable identity except what was given to them by the left. Take away government force, and people will be free to criticize and discriminate against them in their rational self-interest. No sane person wants their children corrupted by mentally ill perverts.
People have self ownership so they can do what they want with their own bodies. Whether you want to fashion a penis out of a clitoris or stick your dick in a Thai lady boy.
I think there is a distinction between people who are gay and people who are "faggots" (to borrow the 4chan way of putting it). Nothing wrong with being gay, just don't be so over the top about it and shove it down peoples throat to the point of making them uncomfortable. I do have some sympathies for why gay people feel the need to be over the top about it, because they do need to signal to other gay people that they are gay. As a straight person, and with straight being the norm, it is implied that I and everyone else is straight unless stated otherwise. Gay people need a way of showing they are gay in order tk meet organically. But there is still a right way and an annoying way if going about it.
Look, there are genuinely gay people. Honestly those people I don't have any issue with at all, they don't go around trying to change my life and I don't go around trying to change theirs.
The folks I have a problem with are these bred gay people, they start off normal but get into some clique of weirdos that try to outdo each other to their point their over there chopping off their dicks and trying to get me fired for not knowing some off the wall pronoun they made up last week. Those guys right there can fuck right off. Go on and chop off whatever you want, but don't go getting upset at me for viewing you are the circus freak that you've become.
Agreed. I know someone who just came out as trans and "he" is now claiming to be a woman. He has a beard. A long one. He isnt going to shave it, either. At some point people need to step back and say, "fuck, man. Im a bearded woman. What the fuck am i doing?" Do you know how hard it is to take someone claiming to be a bearded woman seriously?
Indeed. My hypothesis of degeneracy is that it lies on a spectrum, the same spectrum as pedophiles, transgenders and such. Society exists to keep degeneracy at bay.
The movement is a political tool, and the individuals are dealing with various mental illnesses that sound difficult, I wish them the best in that.
I think nature allows for creative ways to procreate. Lgbtq is that expression. For example 50% of men do not pass on their genetics. That's huge. These other sexual expressions are subsets that may arise from this problem. A man who dresses as a woman may have a better chance of gaining the confidence of another woman and being able to pass on their genetics. A pedophile may be driven to fuck their children instead of eat them during a famine thus continueing the race instead of dying out. Nature doesn't give a fuck about your feelings on degeneration, however I believe all humans have the right to their own bodies and the choice they make. Children do not have rights because they can not claim them, therefore they can not give consent.
Agreed. Obviously their are better ways to procreate and in a k society the male and female parents have a few children and invest energy into each one to ensure the best chance of success. In r populations the family unit breaks down and there is little investment into children. These societies collapse when they exhaust their resources, either through over population or missuse of resources or both. I think what we are seeing in America is the change from a k type dominant society to an r type dominant society. This is why there are more expressions of negative type sexualities now. It isn't about the future, its about bliss in the moment at the expense of the future.
"LGBT" is practically incompatible with NAP.
"LGBT" (and even "gay") are marketing terms invented by left-wingers to legitimize various forms of mental illness. They are their top new activist class, who owe their place in society and their very self-esteem to government force, and they would do anything to defend the state.
That movement has no sustainable identity except what was given to them by the left. Take away government force, and people will be free to criticize and discriminate against them in their rational self-interest. No sane person wants their children corrupted by mentally ill perverts.
I do not hate anyone, and I encourage people to resist their illnesses and pursue virtue - something that the left-wing thugs have now made illegal.
Both reproductive biology and the free market are different applications of the same emergent evolutionary forces.
I don't give a shit about what you do in your bedroom.
I give a shit about what goes on in the boardroom.
I don't think about them at least as much as possible
People have self ownership so they can do what they want with their own bodies. Whether you want to fashion a penis out of a clitoris or stick your dick in a Thai lady boy.
I think their movement is winning a propaganda war, and most of the grifters in charge are annoying a.f.
The common alphabet people (And I don't mean 3 letter agencies) are fine with me, and on average are better people than straight people.
Meh.
I think there is a distinction between people who are gay and people who are "faggots" (to borrow the 4chan way of putting it). Nothing wrong with being gay, just don't be so over the top about it and shove it down peoples throat to the point of making them uncomfortable. I do have some sympathies for why gay people feel the need to be over the top about it, because they do need to signal to other gay people that they are gay. As a straight person, and with straight being the norm, it is implied that I and everyone else is straight unless stated otherwise. Gay people need a way of showing they are gay in order tk meet organically. But there is still a right way and an annoying way if going about it.